There is a photograph from 1966: Yves Saint Laurent stands in his atelier, fitting a Le Smoking jacket on a model
There is a photograph from 1966: Yves Saint Laurent stands in his atelier, fitting a Le Smoking jacket on a model. His hands adjust the lapel. The jacket's satin shawl collar catches the light. Behind them, a tailor pins a sleeve. The image is quiet, procedural. The jacket would become the most cited silhouette in women's fashion for the next six decades. At the time, it was Tuesday.
Saint Laurent built a vocabulary before it built a mythology. The house opened in 1961, after the designer's abbreviated and unhappy tenure at Dior. He was twenty-five. Pierre Bergé secured the backing. The first collection showed in January 1962. It was not revolutionary. It was precise. Day dresses, clean coats, a restrained palette. The press noted the discipline. What followed over the next fifteen years was not disruption but translation: taking the codes of menswear, military dress, and non-Western garments and moving them onto the female body without apology or softening.
The tuxedo jacket arrived in 1966, but the gesture was already present earlier. In 1965, the Mondrian dress—blocks of colour borrowed from the painter, rendered in jersey shifts. The garment was legible, direct. It did not require a manifesto. By 1968, there were safari jackets. In 1976, the Ballets Russes collection pulled from Léon Bakst's costume designs. These were not tributes. They were appropriations, made without the anxiety that marks homage. Saint Laurent borrowed the way tailors borrow a seam allowance: as material.
The house's first era was not about rebellion. It was about access. The Le Smoking gave women a garment that had been withheld. It did not make them look like men. It made them look like themselves in a jacket that fit the shoulder correctly. That is a different project than androgyny. Androgyny implies a middle ground. Saint Laurent's tailoring implied nothing. It stated.
Tom Ford and the commercial turn
By the time Tom Ford arrived as creative director in 1999, the house had been adrift for a decade. Yves Saint Laurent had stepped back from ready-to-wear in 1998. The maison was under the Gucci Group. Ford's mandate was clear: make it profitable. He did. His first collection for Saint Laurent showed in Paris in October 2000. The reviews were split. The clothes were not.
Ford's Saint Laurent was about sex, but it was not subtle. The fall 2000 collection featured transparent blouses, low-slung trousers, and a fur coat worn open over bare skin. The references were there—1970s Saint Laurent, Studio 54, the era when the house was synonymous with a certain kind of Parisian night—but Ford's hand was louder. He took the archive and turned the volume up. The silhouette was narrow, the palette was black and jewel tones, and the intention was seduction as a commercial engine.
It worked. Sales climbed. The stores filled. Ford understood that a house could mine its own past as raw material, and that nostalgia, when delivered with enough confidence, reads as authority. His tenure lasted four years. He left in 2004, after tensions with the parent company. The house cycled through Stefano Pilati, who spent eight years trying to find a register between Ford's explicitness and the founder's intellectual restraint. It was a narrow lane. Pilati's work was often beautiful. It was rarely loud enough to register outside the industry.
Vaccarello and the return to line
Anthony Vaccarello took over in 2016. He had worked at Fendi, at Versus Versace, and had run his own label. His first Saint Laurent collection was shown in Paris that October. The silhouette was immediately legible: high waisted, short hemmed, sharp shouldered. The models walked in mini dresses with exaggerated sleeves, in tuxedo jackets cropped above the navel, in thigh-high boots that turned the leg into an unbroken line. The palette was black, broken occasionally by gold or white.
Vaccarello's project is not reinterpretation. It is insistence. He has returned to the house's most cited pieces—the tuxedo, the safari jacket, the Saharienne—and rendered them in proportions that refuse ease. The jackets are cut close. The trousers sit at the natural waist. The hemlines are abbreviated. This is not 1970s Saint Laurent. It is a conversation with that era, conducted in a different grammar. Where the founder's work allowed air, Vaccarello's work compresses. The effect is architectural. The clothes do not drape. They hold.
The house's current output is consistent. Each season refines the same vocabulary: tailoring, mini lengths, a lean silhouette, and a nocturnal colour range. The references shift—rock and roll, the Left Bank, Helmut Newton's photographs—but the formula does not. Vaccarello has found a lane and stayed in it. That is not a criticism. Consistency is a commercial strategy. It is also a creative one. The work is legible. A Saint Laurent jacket from 2018 and one from 2024 share a language. That language is control.
What remains
Saint Laurent no longer belongs to a single vision. It belongs to Kering. The house generates over €2.5 billion annually. It has stores in seventy-three countries. The runway shows are streamed, dissected, and converted into product within weeks. The atelier still exists on Avenue Marceau. The tailoring is still precise. The house's archive is vast, and it is referenced constantly—by Vaccarello, by stylists, by other designers who borrow the tuxedo jacket's proportions or the safari jacket's utility pockets.
What persists is not a philosophy. It is a set of tools. The house proved that a woman could wear a man's jacket without it being costume. It proved that fashion could borrow from art, from uniforms, from other cultures, and make those borrowings into commerce. It proved that a vocabulary, once established, could be returned to for decades without exhausting itself. The Le Smoking has been recut, resized, and reissued more than a hundred times. It still works. That is not nostalgia. That is infrastructure.
The founder died in 2008. The house continued. Vaccarello's version is not the same as Ford's, which was not the same as the original. But the through line is the jacket. The way it sits on the shoulder. The way the lapel folds. The way it makes the wearer stand differently. That is the work. The rest is commentary.
There is a photograph from 2023: a model backstage at the Saint Laurent show in Paris. She wears a black tuxedo jacket, cropped short. Her hand adjusts the lapel. Behind her, a dresser pins a sleeve. The image is quiet, procedural. It is also forty years later. The jacket still walks into the room first.