There's a camel coat from the 1968 collection still circulating in the resale market
There's a camel coat from the 1968 collection still circulating in the resale market. Straight-cut, notched lapel, no belt. The kind of thing that doesn't announce itself. Celine made thousands of them, and they wore into the wardrobes of women who didn't think much about fashion but needed to move through Paris in November. That coat is a better summary of the house's first fifty years than any campaign.
Celine began in 1945 as a children's shoe workshop. Céline Vipiana and her husband Richard opened the atelier on rue Malte, and within a decade they'd moved into leather goods for women who worked. Not society women. Women with commutes. The bags were structured but soft enough to collapse under an arm. The shoes had low block heels. By the sixties, the house had added ready-to-wear that leaned into the same logic: tailoring that didn't require an occasion.
The logo—an arc over serif capitals—appeared in the seventies, but it stayed small. Celine wasn't interested in being read from across a room. The customer base was loyal in a way that didn't require validation. These were women who bought the same bag in two colours, not because they collected but because the first one worked.
Michael Kors and the American interlude
When LVMH acquired Celine in 1996, the house had reputation but little heat. The group installed Michael Kors the following year, a choice that made sense on paper: an American designer known for sportswear ease, a French maison built on understated function. What arrived was cleaner than what Kors was doing under his own name—less jewellery, more neutrals—but it was still American sportswear. Knit dressing, chainlink hardware, logo'd canvas in khaki and cream.
The Boogie bag launched in 2002. Soft pebbled calf, double handles, a slumped hobo shape that photographed well on shoulders. It sold. Celine's revenue grew, and the house became legible to a customer who hadn't previously registered it. But the work didn't accumulate into a point of view. Kors left in 2004, and what followed were two short tenures—Roberto Menichetti, then Ivana Omazic—that steadied the commercial line without shifting the centre.
By 2008, Celine had become the kind of brand that department store buyers could describe but not defend. Accessible luxury, they'd say. Contemporary price point. The language of a house that had misplaced its own.
Phoebe Philo and the reset
Phoebe Philo's appointment in 2008 was a rescue and a reinvention. She'd left Chloé the year prior, and LVMH gave her time and an atelier in Paris. When the first collection debuted for Spring 2010, it was clear she hadn't spent the interim studying Celine's archive. She'd spent it thinking about what a woman with a career and a day actually needed.
The silhouette was wide, straight, often asymmetric. Trousers sat low on the hip and broke over flat shoes. Knits were boxy enough to layer over shirts without pulling. Colour came in blocks—cobalt, rust, camel, navy—but the palette was never sweet. This wasn't minimalism as aesthetic; it was reduction as editorial position. Philo had cut away anything that asked for accommodation.
The bags followed the same logic. The Luggage tote arrived in 2010, a trapezoidal structured shape with a face that looked vaguely anthropomorphic. It was deeply impractical—the wings jutted, the leather was stiff—and it became the bag every editor carried for three years. The Trio, a set of three zip pouches on one strap, turned a travel organiser into an evening bag. The Box, a rigid top-handle in smooth calf, had the proportions of a 1950s handbag but none of the decorative instinct.
Philo's Celine became the house that women in the industry bought when they stopped performing for the industry. It was knowing without being referential. The tailoring had shoulders but they were pitched forward. The jewellery was geometric and chunky, closer to sculpture than adornment. By 2015, Celine had become the standard against which quiet luxury—before anyone called it that—was measured.
She left in December 2017. The last collection, for Spring 2018, included a navy wool coat with an oversized collar and sleeves that skimmed past the wrist. It looked like the kind of thing that would still be in someone's wardrobe in 2032, not because it was timeless but because it worked.
Hedi Slimane and the house now
Hedi Slimane arrived in February 2018 and immediately removed the accent aigu from the logo. The collection that followed six months later was a complete break. Skinny jeans, leather blazers, pussy-bow blouses, micro bags in logo'd jacquard. The silhouette was his silhouette—the one he'd developed at Dior Homme and refined at Saint Laurent—and it had nothing to do with what Philo had built.
The reaction was loud and divided, but the commercial results were unambiguous. Slimane's Celine grew revenue by double digits in the first year. The Triomphe bag, a structured shoulder style with an oversized logo clasp, became the house's bestseller. The Teen Soft 16, a pillow-soft satchel in smooth calf, followed. Both bags leaned into logo visibility in a way Philo's work had refused.
Slimane's shows are staged as cultural events. He shoots campaigns in Los Angeles, casts musicians and actors, and positions Celine as a lifestyle proposition rather than a wardrobe solution. The tailoring is still there—he's a better tailor than he's given credit for—but it's tighter, more coded. A black wool blazer now reads as rock-and-roll costuming, not as a piece of clothing that solves the problem of needing to look serious in a meeting.
What's clarified over six years is that Slimane isn't interested in continuing the house Philo shaped. He's building a different one, and LVMH is backing it. Celine now operates in the same commercial register as Saint Laurent and Balenciaga: high volume, high visibility, younger customer base, significant accessories revenue. The retail expansion has been aggressive. Standalone stores in secondary cities, menswear flagships, a beauty line launched in 2024.
The customer who loved Philo's Celine has mostly moved on. Some went to The Row. Others to Khaite, Toteme, Lemaire. A few still buy Slimane's tailoring and ignore the rest. The house they remember doesn't exist in the current collection, and Slimane hasn't suggested it should.
What remains
There's a version of this story where Celine is a house that lost its way twice—once under Kors, once under Slimane. But that assumes a house has a single correct direction, and Celine's history suggests otherwise. Vipiana built a business on practical elegance. Kors made it American. Philo made it intellectual. Slimane made it loud.
What's consistent is that Celine absorbs the vision of whoever is running it. The house has no founding mythology to protect, no signature fabric or archival shape that must appear every season. The logo is ninety percent of the brand equity, and even that Slimane was allowed to alter.
Last year a sample sale in Paris moved through six years of Slimane stock in two hours. Triomphe bags, Teen Soft 16s, leather blazers in every size. The line wrapped around the block at seven in the morning. By noon the racks were stripped. A woman walked out with four of the same black wool coat, different sizes, presumably for daughters or friends. It looked nothing like the camel coat from 1968, but it was doing the same work: moving through the world without asking for attention, ageing into someone's life. That's still Celine. Just not the one anyone writes about.