Complimentary worldwide shipping on orders over €300.
Bonjour Soir

## The Basement Office

Jean-Claude Beaumont··5 min

The Basement Office

In the spring of 1993, Miuccia Prada stood in a small room beneath the Via Sant'Andrea flagship and watched a model turn in a short skirt made from a fabric most people would use to line a coat. The collection had no name yet — that would come later, borrowed from her childhood nickname — but the idea was already clear. This would be Prada's younger sister. Not literally younger, but structurally so: cheaper, faster, less burdened by the weight of the mother house.

Miu Miu was not, as the mythology sometimes suggests, a spontaneous creative outburst. It was a calculated move. By the early nineties, Prada had become what it set out to critique: serious, intellectual, expensive. The nylon backpack that launched the house into relevance in 1985 now retailed for several hundred dollars. Miuccia, who had spent the previous decade turning her grandfather's leather-goods business into a vehicle for her own ambivalence about fashion, found herself needing an outlet for the parts of her sensibility that didn't fit the Prada narrative. The girlish bits. The unserious bits. The clothes that didn't require a thesis.

Her husband, Patrizio Bertelli, saw the commercial logic immediately. A second line could capture a younger customer without diluting the Prada brand. It could move faster, take risks, fail without consequence. And it could be priced to sell volume. The first Miu Miu collection — shown in Milan, not Paris, deliberately positioned as secondary — featured miniskirts in duchesse satin, cardigans with crystal buttons, and shoes with a blocky heel that looked almost childish. The palette was acidic: lime, tangerine, a particular shade of pink that recalled cheap drugstore makeup. Critics called it 'Prada Lite.' Miuccia called it liberation.

The Prada Problem

To understand Miu Miu, one must first understand what Miuccia Prada was trying to escape. She had not trained as a designer. She studied political science, joined the Communist Party, spent five years at the Piccolo Teatro in Milan studying mime. She came to fashion sideways, inheriting the family business in 1978 with no particular enthusiasm for it. Her early collections were acts of refusal: no logos, no obvious luxury, no sex. Prada in the eighties was about withholding.

By 1992, that withholding had calcified into a house style. Every collection was an essay. Every garment carried the weight of Miuccia's intellectual ambivalence. The clothes were brilliant, often, but they were also exhausting. And they were not, in any conventional sense, fun.

Miu Miu was the permission slip. Where Prada interrogated femininity, Miu Miu could simply perform it. Where Prada was austere, Miu Miu could be gaudy. The distinction was not always legible — both lines came from the same brain, the same studio, often the same fabrics — but the intent was different. Prada asked questions. Miu Miu answered them with a shrug and a very short skirt.

The Vocabulary

Early Miu Miu established a visual language that has remained remarkably consistent for three decades. Low-slung waistbands. Cropped cardigans with the buttons fastened wrong. Brocade miniskirts worn with knee socks. Shoes with a square toe and a heel that looked borrowed from a school uniform. The silhouette was adolescent, but the fabrics were not: damask, faille, double-faced cashmere. This was not fast fashion. It was expensive fashion pretending to be cheap fashion, which is a different and more complicated thing.

The bags followed the same logic. Where a Prada bag announced its pedigree through material and restraint, a Miu Miu bag announced it through colour and hardware. The first Miu Miu handbag, introduced in 1995, was a small top-handle style in patent leather the colour of a sports car. It had oversized gold-tone hardware and a logo that was larger, less discreet, than anything Prada would permit. It sold immediately.

Over the years, the house refined its vocabulary without fundamentally changing it. The Matelassé bag, introduced in 2010, took the quilted leather technique Prada had used in the seventies and rendered it in shades no one's grandmother would recognise: bubblegum, mint, coral. The Wander bag, launched in 2020, was a hobo style in crinkled leather with a logo so large it verged on parody. Both became commercial successes. Both would have been unthinkable under the Prada label.

The Actress Economy

Miu Miu's cultural position shifted in the mid-2010s, when a generation of actresses began wearing the clothes not as costume but as civilian dress. Chloë Sevigny in a Miu Miu coat at Sundance. Lupita Nyong'o in a Miu Miu gown at the Met. Most significantly, a series of campaigns featuring actresses — not models, actresses — shot by photographers like Alasdair McLellan and Inez & Vinoodh. The message was clear: this was fashion for women with interior lives.

In 2016, Miu Miu launched Women's Tales, a series of short films directed by women, funded by the house but editorially independent. The films — by directors including Agnès Varda, Miranda July, and Alice Rohrwacher — had nothing to do with selling clothes. They were, in the language of the time, content. But they were also a signal. Miu Miu was no longer just Prada's younger sister. It was its own entity, with its own constituency, and that constituency was not defined by age or income but by a certain kind of self-aware femininity. One could wear Miu Miu and still be taken seriously. That had not always been true.

What Remains

Today, Miu Miu is a house without a founder in the traditional sense. Miuccia Prada still designs every collection, now alongside Raf Simons, who joined Prada as co-creative director in 2020. Simons contributes to both labels, but his influence on Miu Miu is less pronounced. The house remains, in vocabulary and sensibility, Miuccia's.

The question of succession looms. Miuccia is seventy-five. Bertelli is seventy-eight. Their son, Lorenzo, runs marketing and communications for the Prada Group but has shown no interest in design. The company is publicly traded but still majority-controlled by the family. When Miuccia steps back — and one suspects she will not do so willingly — the question is whether Miu Miu can survive without her. The house is not built on a set of codes that can be handed to a new designer like a recipe. It is built on a particular kind of ambivalence, a willingness to undermine one's own seriousness, that is difficult to replicate.

For now, Miu Miu continues to do what it has always done: make clothes that are smarter than they look and less serious than they are. The fall 2024 collection featured micro-miniskirts in Prince of Wales check, worn with argyle knee socks and loafers. It was, depending on one's perspective, either a brilliant commentary on the male gaze or a very expensive school uniform. Probably both. That has always been the point.