Livraison internationale offerte dès €300.
Bonjour Soir

The pleated skirt arrives in a box barely larger than a hardback

Jean-Claude Beaumont··6 min

The pleated skirt arrives in a box barely larger than a hardback. Unwrap it and the thing weighs less than you expect — a wisp of technical nylon, lined in silk charmeuse, cut on the bias so the pleats fall in a spiral rather than straight down. There is no visible label. The waistband closes with a single hook, no zip. It is signed, if you know where to look, by the absence of fuss.

Miu Miu turns thirty-three this year, and most of what we remember about it is loud. The micro-miniskirts that dominated spring 2022. The ballet flats with crystals heaped like cake frosting. The logo, stamped in silver across patent-leather Mary Janes, or stitched in block letters onto a nylon backpack. But beneath that noise — and Miuccia Prada has always understood the value of noise — runs a second language, quieter and more durable. It is a language of construction, not decoration. And if you strip away the runway hysteria and the Instagram churn, what remains is a set of gestures so specific that they amount to a house style.

La coupe en biais et le tombé inattendu

Miuccia Prada launched Miu Miu in 1993 as a kind of laboratory — a place to test ideas too young, too irreverent, or too deliberately awkward for the Prada mainline. The name itself, a family nickname, suggested intimacy. The first collection leaned into that: slip dresses in duchesse satin, cardigans shrunk to doll-scale, a perversity of proportion that read as both naïve and calculated. But the real work, the part that didn't photograph as cleanly, was in the cut.

Prada has always sewn on the bias when a straight grain would do. At Miu Miu, that tendency sharpens. Skirts that should sit at the hip drop to mid-thigh. Blouses gape at the shoulder, then pull taut across the ribs. The effect is destabilising — not quite wrong, but never quite settled. One suspects this is the point. A garment cut on the bias moves with the body rather than against it, but it also refuses to behave predictably. It twists. It clings in unexpected places. It makes you aware, constantly, that you are wearing a constructed thing.

The nylon pleated skirt, which has appeared in some form nearly every season since 1998, is the clearest distillation of this. The pleat itself is heat-set, permanent, engineered to spring back after washing. But the bias cut ensures that the pleats never hang parallel. They spiral, they overlap, they create a sense of movement even when the wearer is standing still. It is a trick of geometry, and it is as close as Miu Miu comes to a signature.

Le soulier qui refuse d'être confortable

Then there are the shoes. Not the viral ones — not the ballet flat with the ankle strap, not the platform Mary Jane that sold out in forty-eight hours — but the shoes that recur, season after season, with minor variations and no fanfare. The block-heeled pump with a square toe. The kitten-heeled mule in patent leather. The loafer with a stacked sole and a grosgrain bow.

What these share is a deliberate refusal of comfort. The heel is always slightly too high or too low. The toe box is too narrow, or too square, or lined in a slick fabric that offers no grip. The strap, if there is one, sits a centimetre too far forward, so the foot slides. This is not carelessness. Miuccia Prada has said, more than once, that she distrusts ease. A shoe that feels good, she argues, makes you forget you are wearing it. A shoe that pinches, or wobbles, or forces you to adjust your gait — that shoe keeps you present.

The house has leaned into this discomfort with a kind of glee. In autumn 2016, Miu Miu showed a ankle boot with a cylindrical heel placed not at the back of the foot but dead centre, directly beneath the arch. It was unwearable in any practical sense, and it sold regardless. The point was not utility. The point was to make visible the artifice of the shoe itself — to remind the wearer, and anyone watching, that fashion is a performance, not a service.

Les accessoires qui ne cherchent pas à durer

Accessories at Miu Miu occupy a strange position. The house produces bags — the Matelassé, the Wander, the Arcadie — that command four-figure price tags and multi-year waitlists. But it also produces objects so flimsy, so transparently disposable, that their presence in a luxury lineup feels like a provocation.

The nylon belt bag, for instance, which debuted in spring 2000 and has never quite gone away. It is made from the same technical fabric as the pleated skirts, lined in nothing, closed with a plastic buckle. The logo is screen-printed, not embossed. It costs, at present, 750 euros. One could argue that this is absurd. One could also argue that it is honest. The bag does not pretend to be an heirloom. It does not invoke craft or heritage or the atelier. It is a piece of branded nylon, priced according to the brand, and it wears its disposability as a kind of dare.

This tension — between the precious and the throwaway, between the hand-stitched and the heat-sealed — is central to what Miu Miu does. The house has never pretended to revere tradition. It borrows from it, certainly. The Matelassé quilting is a direct lift from Chanel. The Mary Jane silhouette comes from schoolgirl uniforms, filtered through a certain European kink aesthetic. But the reverence is always undercut by something cheaper, something synthetic, something that refuses to take itself seriously.

Ce qui reste quand le bruit s'arrête

Miuccia Prada stepped back from day-to-day design at Prada in 2020, handing the reins to Raf Simons in a co-creative director arrangement. Miu Miu, notably, she kept for herself. The autumn 2024 collection, shown in March, felt like a distillation of thirty years of these quiet codes. Bias-cut skirts in wool crêpe, pleated to the point of abstraction. Shoes with heels placed just off-centre. Bags in quilted nylon, lined in satin, priced like leather. And almost no logos — nothing you could photograph and post and have it read immediately as Miu Miu.

The trick, if there is one, is that these pieces do not announce themselves. They require a second look. The pleat that spirals instead of falling straight. The heel that forces you to walk differently. The bag that costs as much as a month's rent but weighs less than a paperback. These are not the things that trend. They are the things that remain, season after season, for the people who know where to look.

Stand in a Miu Miu boutique long enough and you will see two kinds of customer. The first comes for the viral piece — the skirt from the spring 2022 campaign, the crystal-heeled pump, whatever is currently circulating on social media. The second comes for the nylon pleated skirt, or the block-heeled loafer, or the quilted crossbody bag that has been in the lineup, with minor variations, since 2004. The first customer buys a moment. The second buys a code.

Whether that code is worth learning is, in the end, a question of how much you trust Miuccia Prada's instinct for the deliberately wrong thing. The skirt that twists. The shoe that pinches. The bag that refuses to last. These are not gestures of comfort or reassurance. They are gestures of provocation, and they have been there, underneath the noise, for three decades. One either finds that compelling or one doesn't. But it is, at the very least, consistent.